Evidence Hub

Corticosteroids for community-acquired pneumonia in non-ICU patients presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hanin A. Alhodathi, H. Hussein, Shamael M. Alali, Zainab A. Hasan, Abdullah Alhussain, Almohanad A. Sait, Hassan A. Alali, Janah M. Almahdi et al.

International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 2026

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is among the most common infectious indications for emergency department attendance and hospitalization and carries a heavy mortality burden despite advances in antimicrobial therapy. Because a dysregulated host inflammatory response independently drives clinical deterioration, corticosteroids have been proposed as adjunctive treatment, but their benefit in non-ICU patients presenting to the emergency department remains unclear. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating systemic corticosteroids versus placebo or standard care in adults with CAP managed outside the ICU. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included time to clinical stability, length of hospital stays, ICU admission, and adverse events. Twelve RCTs were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in mortality between the corticosteroid and control groups (RR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.87–1.10, p=0.71; I²=0%). Neither time to clinical stability nor length of hospital stay differed significantly between groups, though both outcomes showed substantial heterogeneity. Corticosteroid use was associated with a significantly higher risk of hospital readmission (RR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.11–1.64, p<0.001) and hyperglycemia (RR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.49–1.92, p<0.001). Early corticosteroid therapy in non-ICU adults with CAP does not reduce mortality or meaningfully accelerate clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free