Evidence Hub

The effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics administration on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR

Eiki Iida, Nao Ichihara, T. Hifumi, Kasumi Shirasaki, Tasuku Hada, Shutaro Isokawa, A. Inoue, T. Sakamoto et al.

Resuscitation Plus, 2025

2,157 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Aim Despite improved outcomes with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a significant complication. While prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended for conventional CPR, their effectiveness in ECPR patients remains unclear. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study, a multicenter, retrospective cohort of OHCA patients treated with ECPR. Patients who died within three days of admission were excluded. The primary outcome was early-onset VAP development, with secondary outcomes being 30-day mortality and neurological outcomes at discharge. The effect of prophylactic antibiotics, administered within 24 h after admission, was estimated by combining propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression. Missing covariates were multiply imputed. Results Of 2157 patients, 919 were included for propensity score matching, yielding a matched cohort of 448. In the matched cohort, prophylactic antibiotics administration was not significantly associated with VAP incidence (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39–1.01), although the incidence was numerically lower (24.1% vs 31.3%). No effects were observed in 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64–1.57) or unfavorable neurological outcomes (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.56–1.52). Sensitivity analyses using different definitions of VAP and population yielded consistent results. Conclusions Although point estimates…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 2,157 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free