Evidence Hub

P-2280. Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Immunosuppressed Patients Admitted to the ICU

André Emilio Viñán Garcés, Natalia Sanabria-Herrera, Sara Duque, Esteban Garcia-Gallo, Gabriela Guerrón-Gómez, L. F. Reyes

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2025

4,742 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains a crucial infectious cause of global mortality, accounting for a significant proportion of ICU admissions. Immunosuppressed patients frequently develop sCAP; however, the clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU due to sCAP are not clear. Here, we attempted to bridge this gap in the literature. Figure 1 Isolated microorganisms in respiratory samples. A. General cohort; B. No immunosuppression risk factors group; C. Immunosuppression risk factors group Methods This secondary analysis of the prospective MIMIC-IV database included adults admitted to the ICU with CAP diagnosis. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of immunosuppression. Bivariate, multivariate, and survival analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with mortality within the immunosuppressed and their impact on hospital mortality. Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 1-year after discharge survival probability stratified by immunosuppression status. Patients with and without immunosuppression are represented, the first group with 1 (blue) and the last with 0 (red). Results A total of 4742 patients were included, with 1502/4742 (32%) being immunocompromised. The mean age (SD) was 66 ±16.1years, with 2627/4742 (55.4%) males. A total of 1384 respiratory isolations were obtained with Staphylococcus aureus (43.2% vs. 40.6%; p= 0.45) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.20 % vs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,742 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free