Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance and AmpC production in ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae: A retrospective study in Japanese clinical isolates

Watanabe N, Watari T, Otsuka Y, Ito M, Yamagata K, Fujioka M

PloS one, 2024

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The study of Klebsiella quasipneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola, and AmpC production in extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella in Japan is limited, and existing data are insufficient. This study aims to characterize Klebsiella species, determine AmpC production rates, and analyze antimicrobial resistance patterns in ESBL-producing Klebsiella isolates in Japan.

METHODS: A total of 139 clinical isolates of ESBL-producing Klebsiella were collected in Japan, along with their corresponding antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. The isolates were identified using a web-based tool. ESBL genes within the isolates were identified using multiplex PCR. Screening for AmpC-producing isolates was performed using cefoxitin disks, followed by multiplex PCR to detect the presence of AmpC genes. Antimicrobial resistance patterns were analyzed across the predominant ESBL genotypes.

RESULTS: The web-based tool identified 135 isolates (97.1%) as Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4 (2.9%) as K. quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae, with no instances of K. variicola detected. Among K. pneumoniae, the CTX-M-1 group emerged as the predominant genotype (83/135, 61.5%), followed by K. quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae (3/4, 75.0%). The CTX-M-9 group was the second most prevalent genotype in K. pneumoniae (45/135, 33.3%). The high resistance rates were observed for quinolones (ranging from 46.7% to 63.0%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (78.5%). The CTX-M-1 group…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free