Evidence Hub

Distribution and antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria from blood cultures before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Etiz P, Ekenoğlu Merdan Y, Avci P

Journal of infection in developing countries, 2026

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infections is an important clinical challenge. The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on antimicrobial resistance remains a subject of ongoing debate. This single-center study aimed to analyze Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolated from blood cultures and evaluate changes in antimicrobial resistance between the pre-pandemic (March 2018-February 2020) and pandemic (March 2020-February 2022) periods.

METHODOLOGY: Blood culture data collected over 4 years were retrospectively analyzed using the BACT/ALERT 3D system. Bacterial identification was conducted with the VITEK® 2 compact system, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria.

RESULTS: Of 1,668 positive blood cultures, 38.3% yielded GNB. There was an increase in Gram-negative isolates during the pandemic, compared to the pre-pandemic period (55.9% vs. 44.1%). Resistance changes were detected in extensive antibiogram analyses in which 18 different antibiotics were studied for the 4 most frequently isolated species, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. During the pandemic period, resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftriaxone, and cefuroxime decreased; while resistance to amikacin, levofloxacin, and cefepime increased; except in Escherichia coli.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free