Evidence Hub

Time-series analysis of antimicrobial use and resistance trends in a tertiary hospital in China from 2017 to 2022: Implications for national stewardship efforts

Zhang S, Xie J, Li Y, Qian M, Lin B, Abdul-Aziz MH, Xu H

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate five-year trends (2017-2022) in antimicrobial consumption and antimicrobial resistance in a tertiary hospital in China, and to assess the association between antimicrobial use and resistance using time-series modelling.

METHODS: This retrospective study analysed in-patient hospital antimicrobial consumption using defined daily doses (DDD) and antimicrobial use density (AUD; DDD per 100 patient-days). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear regression, and the association between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance were evaluated using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models.

RESULTS: Antimicrobial consumption declined markedly (AUD of 65.51 in 2017 to 40.42 in 2021). Significant reductions were observed in intensive care and major surgical departments. Second- and third-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly used agents while aminoglycosides and imidazole derivatives demonstrated statistically significant downward trends (p < 0.05). Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were consistently among the most commonly isolated organisms. Significant reductions in resistance were observed for Acinetobacter baumannii to tigecycline (32.46%-3.33%, p < 0.001) and imipenem; (71.34% to 21.05%, p = 0.008, and for Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem (54.19% to 16.67%, p = 0.004). In contrast, fluoroquinolones resistance in E. coli increased significantly (46.90% to 74.61%, p = 0.024). ARIMA modelling showed significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free