Evidence Hub

Multivariate regression reveals linear correlation between ICU Klebsiella pneumoniae resistance and antibiotic use

Xia F, Pan Y, Chen S, Tao Z, Pan X

Journal of infection in developing countries, 2025

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the macro-quantitative correlation between Klebsiella pneumoniae resistance rates and concurrent antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit (ICU), to guide treatment for chronic refractory infections caused by this pathogen, by optimizing outcomes for critically ill patients while curbing bacterial resistance spread or transmission.

METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the resistance rate of K. pneumoniae and the concurrent use of antimicrobial agents in the ICU. A multiple linear regression model was employed to analyze whether there was an independent linear correlation between the two, and to identify the relevant factors.

RESULTS: 936 K. pneumoniae isolates were identified in the ICU between 2020 and 2024, representing 20.45% (936/4,577) of all bacterial isolates recovered from the ICU. The resistance rates to most antimicrobial agents, except for tigecycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, exceeded 65%, indicating a severe resistance situation. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the resistance rates of K. pneumoniae to imipenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftazidime were independently linear correlated only with piperacillin-tazobactam defined daily doses (DDDs), with regression coefficients (β) of 0.221, 0.224, and 0.166, respectively. The resistance rates to ceftriaxone, cefoperazone-sulbactam, and ertapenem were positively correlated with piperacillin-tazobactam DDDs. Resistance to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free