Evidence Hub

Trends of antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infections at a large traditional Chinese medicine hospital in China: a 10-year surveillance study (2015-2024)

Chen J, Zhang G, Zheng X, Liu W

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the distribution and antimicrobial resistance of bloodstream infections (BSIs) pathogens at a large traditional Chinese medicine hospital in China.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the pathogen distribution of BSIs and the changes in antimicrobial resistance during a 10-year period (2015-2024) was conducted in Longhua Hospital. Isolate identification was carried out by VITEK®2 Compact. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination.

RESULTS: The most common Gram-negative and Gram-positive BSI-causing bacteria were Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), respectively. The isolation rate of E. coli dropped sharply from 37.33% in 2015-2016 to 15.37% in 2023-2024 (P < 0.01). E. coli displayed the highest sensitivity rates to imipenem, meropenem, and amikacin, with sensitivity rates exceeding 90.00%. The dramatic decreasing trends were observed for Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), cephalosporins, imipenem, meropenem, tobramycin, and levofloxacin. S. aureus had a relatively high resistance rate to penicillin G, and the resistance rate of S. aureus to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin appeared to be rising. The isolation rate of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) ranged from 25.00% to 40.00%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infection was associated with a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free