Evidence Hub

Serum lactate dehydrogenase as a prognostic marker for 90-day mortality in connective tissue disease patients receiving glucocorticoids and hospitalized with pneumonia: a cohort study

Xiangkuan Cheng, Lanling Liu, Yueming Tian, Yuan-Sheng Lin

Scientific Reports, 2025

298 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels have been associated with poor prognosis in various diseases. This study investigates the relationship between serum LDH levels and 90-day mortality in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) receiving glucocorticoids and hospitalized with pneumonia. A total of 298 CTD patients were included in this study. The cohort was divided into three groups based on serum LDH levels (Group 1: < 246 U/L, 0% mortality; Group 2: 246–407 U/L, 26% mortality; Group 3: ≥ 407 U/L, 48% mortality). Clinical and laboratory data were analyzed to evaluate the association between LDH levels and 90-day mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox regression models, and subgroup analyses. Elevated LDH levels were significantly associated with increased mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients in Group 3 (highest LDH levels) had the highest 90-day mortality rate, while those in Group 1 (lowest LDH levels) had the lowest (p < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that every 100 U/L increase in LDH was associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.13, p = 0.02). Patients in Group 3 showed a significantly increased risk of mortality (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.06–4.96, p = 0.036). The subgroup analyses demonstrated stable results across different clinical subgroups. Elevated serum LDH levels, particularly in Group 3, are independently associated with increased 90-day mortality in CTD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 298 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free