Evidence Hub

Multiplex PCR Pneumonia Panel in Critically Ill Patients Did Not Modify Mortality: A Cohort Study

Luisa Fernanda Riaño-Sánchez, C. Álvarez-Moreno, M. Godoy, C. Sierra, M. I. Castañeda, J. Cortés

Antibiotics, 2025

304 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

In critically ill patients, identification of the pathogen may allow for the timely adjustment of antibiotics and improved outcomes. Background/Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess whether performing a multiplex PCR pneumonia panel (PN-panel) in patients with pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU) had any effect on mortality or other important clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients with pneumonia who required ICU admission in four institutions in Bogotá between November 2019 and June 2023. Mortality at 30 days, the length of the hospital and ICU stay, the duration of antibiotics, and their association with the PN-panel performance were evaluated using an inverse probability of the treatment weighting to adjust for covariates and potential confounders. Results: A total of 304 patients were included, including 150 with PN-panel, with a mean age of 65.0 years (SD 14.6). SARS-CoV-2 was the primary etiologic agent in 186 (61.2%) patients, and 256 (84.2%) patients had community-acquired pneumonia. No association was found between 30-day mortality and the PN-panel, with a HR of 1.14 (CI 95% 0.76–1.70), although the assessment by an infectious disease specialist was associated with a lower mortality HR of 0.29 (CI 95% 0.19–0.45). There was no association between the PN-panel and antimicrobial therapy duration or other clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The use of the PN-panel was not associated with changes in mortality,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 304 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free