Evidence Hub

Outcomes of ceftriaxone 2 g versus 1 g daily in hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

Jumpei Taniguchi, S. Aso, H. Matsui, K. Fushimi, H. Yasunaga

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2025

471 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Ceftriaxone is widely used for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia, but its optimal dosage remains unclear. Methods We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with pneumonia between July 2010 and March 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan. They were categorized into those receiving 2 or 1 g/day of ceftriaxone within the first 2 days of hospitalization. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included overall adverse events (composite of biliary tract infection, Clostridioides difficile infection and allergic reactions) and each adverse event. A subgroup analysis was conducted for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis was used for comparisons. Results Among the 471 694 eligible patients, 63.3% received 2 g/day and 36.7% received 1 g/day of ceftriaxone. Propensity-score analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day in-hospital mortality between the two groups [4.5% versus 4.6%; risk difference (RD), −0.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.3% to 0.1%; P = 0.219]. Overall adverse events were slightly higher in the 2 g/day group (1.9% versus 1.8%; RD, 0.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%–0.2%; P = 0.007), particularly the proportion of C. difficile infection. In the subgroup analysis of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the 2 g/day regimen was associated with lower 30-day mortality (17.2% versus 20.4%; RD, −3.2%; 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 471 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free