Evidence Hub

Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy is associated with improved survival in ICU patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study

Haiming Hu, Yixing Zhu, R. Hu, Li-Juan Zhao, Xiangwen Zeng, Xue Wu, Rui Qiu, Yihao Nie et al.

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

1,000 participants

Abstract

Background Coagulation disorders are common complications in patients with pulmonary infections. Studies have suggested beneficial effects of anticoagulant therapies in patients with COVID-19. However, the usefulness of prophylactic anticoagulant therapies in patients with non-COVID-19 pulmonary infections is still a matter of debate. This study aimed to assessed the impact of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy in ICU patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods Patients were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to minimize differences. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess mortality. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for short-term mortality (7-day). The E-value was calculated to unmeasured confounding. To further explore the optimal anticoagulant administration, subgroup analyses were performed. We also explored the optimal administration strategies including the timing and duration of anticoagulant therapy. Results A total of 1,000 ICU patients were included, with 500 receiving prophylactic anticoagulation therapy and 500 not. Both 7-day mortality (7.6% vs. 19.6%; p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (19.6% vs. 31.2%; p < 0.001) in the anticoagulant group were lower than non-users. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also showed a significantly lower prevalence of short-term mortality in patients who used anticoagulants.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free