Evidence Hub

Outcomes associated with ventilator-associated events (VAE), respiratory infections (VARI), pneumonia (VAP) and tracheobronchitis (VAT) in ventilated pediatric ICU patients: A multicentre prospective cohort study

Y. Peña-López, María Slocker-Barrio, Juan-Carlos de-Carlos-Vicente, Marta Serrano-Megías, I. Jordan-García, Jordi Rello

Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 2024

391 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

An objective categorization of respiratory infections based on outcomes is an unmet clinical need. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitis remain used in clinical practice, whereas ventilator-associated events (VAE) are limited to surveillance purposes.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis from a multicentre observational prospective cohort study. VAE were defined as a sustained increase in minimum Oxygen inspired fraction (FiO2) and/or Positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) of ≥ 0.2/2 cm H2O respectively, or an increase of 0.15 FiO2 + 1 cm H20 positive end-expiratory pressures for ≥ 1 calendar-day.

SETTING

15 Paediatric Intensive Care Units.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care and hospital length of stay; (LOS) and mortality.

RESULTS

A cohort of 391 ventilated children with an age (median, [Interquartile Ranges]) of 1 year[0.2-5.3] and 7 days[5-10] of mechanical ventilation were included. Intensive care and hospital stays were 11 [7-19] and 21 [14-39] days, respectively. Mortality was 5.9 %. Fifty-eight ventilator-associated respiratory infections were documented among 57 patients: Seventeen (29.3 %) qualified as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and 41 (70.7 %) as ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT). Eight pneumonias and 16 tracheobronchitis (47 % vs 39 %,P = 0.571) required positive end-expiratory pressure or oxygen increases consistent with ventilator-associated criteria.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 391 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free