Evidence Hub

The relationship between pneumonia and dental visits in patients with cerebral palsy: A nationwide registry-based cohort study in Taiwan

Fu-Hsuan Liu, Jing-Yang Huang, Yu-Chao Chang

Journal of Dental Sciences, 2024

63,264 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background/purpose In general, improving oral health can reduce the risk of pneumonia. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the risk of pneumonia between cerebral palsy (CP) cohort and non-CP cohort as well as the association of pneumonia with the number of dental visits in CP patients in Taiwan. Materials and methods We identified 10,544 patients who were diagnosed with CP between 2010 and 2019 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. 63,264 individuals who had never been diagnosed with CP were captured and matched in a 6:1 ratio. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was adopted to assess the hazard ratio (HR) of pneumonia between CP cohort and non-CP cohort. Results Our findings demonstrated that CP cohort had 2.619-fold risk for pneumonia as compared with non-CP cohort after adjustment (95 % CI = 2.574–2.813, P < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis indicated that the CP group had significantly higher incidence risk of pneumonia (log rank P < 0.0001). Higher risks of pneumonia in CP patients were associated with younger age, and lower urbanization level. Some comorbidities as well as history of pneumonia had the higher aHR for pneumonia within 180 days prior to index date. In addition, there was a positive association with the more than two dental visits for the decrease 0.887-fold incidence of pneumonia in CP-cohort as compared with no dental visit (95 % CI: 0.799–0.984). Conclusion Taken together, CP patients had a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 63,264 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free