Evidence Hub

Effect of Novel Inflammatory Biomarkers on Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Pneumonia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Wenmei Bai, Yi-De Wang, Fengsen Li

Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2024

324 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease frequently coincides with pneumonia in clinical settings, and both conditions are closely associated with immunoinflammation. The Systemic Immune Inflammatory Index (SII) is a recently identified marker, and its connection to the prognosis of individuals suffering from interstitial lung disease and concurrent pneumonia remains unclear. The objective of this study was to scrutinize the correlation between varying SII levels and unfavorable outcomes in patients grappling with interstitial lung disease complicated by pneumonia.

METHODS

This study encompassed a retrospective multicenter cohort of 324 patients diagnosed with interstitial lung disease and pneumonia, all receiving glucocorticoid treatment during their hospitalization. We initially conducted ROC analysis to determine the optimal SII threshold. Subsequently, we examined disparities in clinical symptoms, physical signs, clinical test data, and other clinical attributes among patients with differing SII levels. Later, we employed the Kaplan-Meier survival curve method to assess the association between distinct SII levels and the 30-day and 90-day mortality rates in patients dealing with interstitial lung disease complicated by pneumonia. Finally, a Cox regression model was employed to identify factors influencing adverse prognosis in these patients.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The findings demonstrated that the optimal SII threshold for predicting 30-day mortality was 1416.97, with an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 324 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free