Evidence Hub

Incidence and risk profiles for pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia receiving home-care case management intervention in Taiwan

Yu-Ting Liu, Wen-ying Chen, Po-Yu Chen, Chih-Chiang Chiu, Chun-Hung Pan, Sheng-Siang Su, Shang-Ying Tsai, C. Chen et al.

Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry (Print), 2025

19,687 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Home-care case management is a type of community outreach service. However, research on the incidence of infectious diseases in patients receiving home-care case management is limited. This study investigated the incidence of various infectious diseases and risk factors for pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia receiving home-care case management. Methods: We used data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, to construct a schizophrenia cohort receiving home-care case management (n = 19,687). Pneumonia was the most common infectious disease at follow-up (n = 3966). To identify risk factors for pneumonia, a nested case–control study was conducted. Risk-set sampling was conducted to randomly select controls for each pneumonia case. Conditional logistic regression was employed for statistical analysis. Results: Among various infectious diseases, pneumonia had the highest standardized incidence ratio in our cohort. Of the 3966 patients with pneumonia identified, 56.9% were men. After pairing, 3961 case–control pairs were established. Psychiatric comorbidities, specifically dementia and depressive disorders, were associated with a higher risk of pneumonia (adjusted incidence rate ratios [aIRRs] = 2.73 and 1.34, respectively). In contrast to oral antipsychotics, long-acting injectables were not associated with an increased pneumonia risk, suggesting that long-acting injectables could be a safer…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19,687 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free