Evidence Hub

Cytotoxicity and virulence attributes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from case reports of patients with necrotizing pneumonia

T. Bolig, S. Nozick, C. Axline, I. Niki, A. Valdes, A. Alisoltanidehkordi, T. L. Turner, F. P. F. Campos et al.

Respiratory Medicine Case Reports, 2025

Abstract

Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative bacterium that commonly causes pneumonia, including a rare and aggressive form of lung infection called necrotizing pneumonia (NP). NP is characterized by hemorrhagic necrosis, abscess formation, and cavitation in the lung. The explanation for why some cases of pneumonia progress to NP remains unclear but may involve bacterial or host factors. Methods To assess whether some strains of P. aeruginosa have unique pathogenic properties that facilitate progression to NP, we obtained six clinical isolates from known cases of P. aeruginosa NP. We measured the genetic relatedness of these isolates, their cytotoxicity towards pulmonary epithelial-like cells, and their virulence in Galleria mellonella. Results The NP isolates did not share a single lineage or sequence type. There was no significant difference in cytotoxicity or G. mellonella mortality between NP isolates and a control group of non-NP clinical and reference strains. However, the NP isolates did show a trend towards higher cytotoxicity than the control strains after 3-h of co-incubation with pulmonary epithelial-like cells (16.3 % versus 1.7 %, p = 0.23). Conclusions Future studies of NP should focus on larger numbers of patients and bacterial strains to further explore whether NP isolates have enhanced cytotoxicity, examine a broader range of bacterial phenotypes and virulence determinants, and consider the role of host factors.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free