Evidence Hub

Factors Affecting the Outcome of Adult Patients with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Non-Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cross-sectional Cohort Study

M. V. Yap, F.J.R. Obillo, K.P. Manongas

Philippine journal of internal medicine, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumonia continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Locally, pneumonia is the 3rd cause of death (2016). Currently, one of the concerns is the rise of resistant microorganisms particularly MRSA. Knowledge regarding MRSA pneumonia is mostly from international data.

This study aims to determine the factors that may affect the outcome of MRSA and non-MRSA pneumonia as well as describe the susceptibility patterns of its etiologic agents.

Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. The setting is a tertiary government hospital. The target subjects are patients 18 y/o and above, with bacteriologically-confirmed pneumonia, and were admitted in 2017.

Results: The results revealed a high rate of MRSA pneumonia (88.2%), most are community-acquired (90%), and factors associated with mortality were: male, Type 2 DM, smoking history, radiographic findings of congestion, and atheromatous/tortuous aorta. For hospital length of stay, no significant difference was noted. For Non-MRSA pneumonia factors associated with mortality were: erythrocytosis, kidney and liver disease, cancer, previous cerebrovascular disease, previous admission (ARMMC), number of comorbidities, findings of altered sensorium, chest retractions, DBP ≤ 60 mmHg, radiographic findings of pulmonary congestion, and classification of CAP-MR. Morbidity factors included: anemia, trauma, multiple comorbidities, radiographic findings of bilateral infiltrates,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free