Evidence Hub

Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Medical Staff in Chinese Hospitals

Chun-Hua Liu, Zijie Sun, Yanran Li, Chengji Li, Fei Wang, Yan Pan, Yu-Zhi Zhou, F. Chen

Medical Science Monitor, 2026

224 participants

Abstract

Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a severe complication in mechanically ventilated patients. Understanding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare providers is crucial for prevention. This study aimed to assess the KAP regarding VAP among doctors and nurses in intensive care units (ICU) and respiratory departments across 9 hospitals in China. Material/Methods This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2024 in 9 hospitals in China. A total of 224 participants, including 62 doctors and 162 nurses, completed a validated questionnaire in intensive care and respiratory departments. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, correlation, logistic regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM) for the nurse cohort. Results A total of 224 valid questionnaires were collected, with 62 from doctors and 162 from nurses. The KAP scores were 9.88±1.42, 41.67±2.86, and 30.45±4.12 for doctors, and 34.45±4.59 for nurses. For nurses, there was a positive correlation between knowledge and attitudes (r=0.212, P=0.007). SEM showed that knowledge directly affected attitudes (β=6.45, P<0.001), but did not significantly predict practices. Conclusions Medical staff showed adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and good practices regarding VAP. However, structural modeling revealed that knowledge and attitudes did not significantly predict practices, suggesting the need to explore other factors and for targeted…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 224 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free