Evidence Hub

Role of hepatocyte-derived fibrinogen-related protein 1 as a serum biomarker in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia and sepsis: A cross-sectional study

Guoqing Wang, Liulian Zhang, Xiaolan Zhu, Kai Qian, Lin Zhu, Boqian Chen, Wan-Jian Gu, Tao Guo et al.

Journal of International Medical Research, 2026

124 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the potential of hepatocyte-derived fibrinogen-related protein 1 (HFREP1) as a biomarker for community-acquired pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia secondary to sepsis. Method This cross-sectional observational study included 124 patients with community-acquired pneumonia, 52 patients with community-acquired pneumonia–sepsis, and 123 healthy controls. Clinical data were collected, including procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels. Serum HFREP1 concentrations were measured, and statistical analyses were performed. Result HFREP1 levels differed significantly among the healthy control, community-acquired pneumonia, and community-acquired pneumonia–sepsis groups (37.2 vs. 211.6 vs. 696.8 ng/mL). Binary logistic regression analysis identified procalcitonin and HFREP1 as independent predictors of community-acquired pneumonia–sepsis, while C-reactive protein was not an independent predictor. The area under the curve for HFREP1 in distinguishing community-acquired pneumonia patients from healthy controls was 0.8810. For differentiating community-acquired pneumonia–sepsis from community-acquired pneumonia, the area under the curves were 0.8814 for HFREP1, 0.8167 for C-reactive protein, and 0.8902 for procalcitonin. Conclusion HFREP1 may serve as a biomarker for community-acquired pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia–sepsis. In community-acquired pneumonia–sepsis, HFREP1 was strongly correlated with C-reactive protein and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 124 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free