Evidence Hub

Utility of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, in Differentiating Childhood Pulmonary Tuberculosis from Bacterial Pneumonia: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Peripheral Hospital in Suburban Mumbai

Ruchika Bagade, P. Joshi, Arsala Mulla

Global Journal of Medicine & Public Health, 2026

30 participants

Abstract

Background: Childhood pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) can clinically mimic bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), making diagnosis difficult, particularly where microbiological confirmation is delayed or unavailable. Complete Blood Count (CBC)-derived parameters, especially the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), may provide a simple and low-cost adjunct for differentiation.

Objective: To evaluate whether routine CBC parameters and the NLR can help differentiate childhood pulmonary TB from bacterial CAP.

Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study included 30 hospitalized children aged 2–14 years from a peripheral hospital in suburban Mumbai (January–July 2026), comprising 15 bacterial CAP and 15 pulmonary TB patients. Clinical features and CBC parameters, including NLR, were compared between groups based on established diagnostic criteria.

Results: The mean age was 5.85±3.00 years in the pneumonia group and 7.47±3.25 years in the TB group (p=0.168). Males constituted 60.0% of the pneumonia group and 53.3% of TB group (p=1.000). Mean WBC count was higher in children with pneumonia than in those with TB (14,009.33±3,898.98 vs. 12,038.67±3,952.76/µL; p=0.180). The mean neutrophil percentage was also higher in pneumonia (74.52±12.70% vs. 66.46±12.32%; p=0.089), whereas lymphocyte percentage was higher in TB (25.23±10.96% vs. 18.71±11.82%; p=0.128). Mean platelet count was 282,867±71,773/µL in pneumonia and 328,200±77015/µL in TB (p=0.107). CRP was higher in pneumonia…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free