Evidence Hub

Association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase with disease severity in community-acquired pneumonia: a cross-sectional study

Niel Rajesh Bhalani, E. Abraham, Ramprasath

Genetics and Molecular Research, 2026

100 participants

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a major cause of infectious morbidity and mortality worldwide despite advances in antimicrobial therapy and supportive care. Early identification of patients at risk of severe disease is essential for appropriate triage and timely management. Although clinical severity scores such as CURB-65 and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) are widely used, readily available inflammatory biomarkers may further improve early risk stratification. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 100 adult patients with community acquired pneumonia admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, laboratory investigations, and chest radiographic findings were recorded. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were measured at admission. Disease severity was assessed using CURB-65 and PSI scores. Correlation analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the association and predictive performance of the biomarkers. Results: Among the 100 patients, 62% were males and the majority belonged to the 41–60-year age group (44%). Fever (92%), cough (88%), and dyspnoea (74%) were the predominant presenting symptoms. Mean NLR increased significantly from 4.2 ± 1.3 in mild CAP to 13.6 ± 3.1 in severe CAP (p60 years, and diabetes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free