Evidence Hub

Aspiration Risk Assessment in Alcohol-intoxicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study using the Simple Swallowing Assessment

Abhinov Thamminaina, T. Abhilash, C. Punnen, Mario Antony, S. Rahul, C. Harikrishnan, Deepack S Kottarathil, Amal Raja Punnen

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2026

250 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is prevalent in Emergency Departments, yet the aspiration risk in alcoholintoxicated patients remains understudied. Aspiration can precipitate life-threatening pneumonia, particularly in patients with impaired protective reflexes.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of aspiration risk and identify clinical predictors in alcohol-intoxicated mild TBI patients using the Simple Swallowing Assessment (SSA) in a tertiary care Emergency Department.

Materials and Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted over 18 months from January 2022 to June 2023 in the Emergency Department, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad, Maharashtra, India India. A total of 250 patients with TBI were screened; 187 patients with mild TBI {Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): 13-15} and confirmed alcohol intoxication {Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) ≥0.08%} were included. Aspiration risk was assessed using the SSA. Demographic characteristics, injury mechanism, BAC, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests for categorical associations, and logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 was used.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 35.4±10.2 with 134 males. Overall aspiration prevalence was 15.7% {95% Confidence Interval (CI), 11.2%-20.2%}.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 250 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free