Evidence Hub

Herpes Simplex Virus Pneumonia in Immunocompetent Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Case Series

D. Lacalaprice, P. Vitale, A. Alleva, Özgün Ömer Asiller, R. Scaini, Giulia Franceschini, M. Flaminio, P. Prati et al.

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2025

818 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency, diagnosis, and management, of herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) pneumonia in patients without known immunodeficiency undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

SETTING

Intensive care unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients without known immunodeficiency who developed HSV-1 pneumonia after cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Baseline, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected. HSV-1 pneumonia was diagnosed by a multidisciplinary team when progressive respiratory deterioration was unresponsive to standard antibiotic therapy and quantitative HSV-1 polymerase chain reaction in a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or bronchial aspirate (BAS) sample documented a viral load >10,000 copies/mL.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 818 patients undergoing cardiac surgery during the study period, 43 were tested for HSV. Among them, 15 (34.9%) had a positive BAL/BAS for HSV-1. In these patients (8 males [53%]; median age, 69 years [interquartile range (IQR), 63-73 years]), quantitative HSV-1 polymerase chain reaction on BAL/BAS documented a median of 3.21 × 10⁶ (IQR, 5.62 × 10⁵-5.73 × 10⁶) copies/mL. Diagnosis was made at a median of 12 days (range, 7.5-19 days) after surgery. Thirteen of the 15 patients (86.7%) were mechanically ventilated, and 11 (73.3%) met criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Median C-reactive protein and procalcitonin values were 108.6 (IQR, 85.7-141.4) mg/L and 1.1…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 818 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free