Evidence Hub

COVID-19 pneumonia in older patients: clinical features and outcomes of a 400 case series

Yosra Cherif, M. Jridi, Samar Derbal, D. Chebbi, S. Farhati, H. Sfar, O. Hentati, F. Ben Dahmen et al.

F1000Research, 2024

222 participants

Abstract

Background Since late 2019, COVID-19 has been a major health issue worldwide. Older patients seemed more susceptible to severe forms and complications with higher mortality rates. This study aimed to identify the clinical features and outcomes of SARS-Cov-2 pneumonia in elderly patients. Methods Retrospective monocentric study in the internal medicine Covid-19 unit of the Ben Arous regional hospital, enrolling admitted patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, aged 65 years and above from September 2020 to September 2021. Results The study group counted 222 women (55.5%). The mean age was 74 years. At least one chronic disease was found in 84.75% of patients. The most common comorbidities were high blood pressure (55.75%), and diabetes mellitus (50%). The most frequent symptoms were dyspnoea (69.8%), fatigue (66.8%) and dry cough (65.8%). Corrected Qt interval was prolonged in 24.2% of cases. Chest computed tomography were performed in 277 cases (69.3%). Ground glass opacities (93.86%), consolidations (73.3%) and crazy paving (36%) were the main findings. Assessment of pulmonary extent found important involvement (41.87%), sever lesions (23.82%), moderate involvement (21.29%) and critical involvement (1.8%). C-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated in 94.25% of patients. Elevated D-dimer levels were common (68.8%). Antinuclear antibodies were positive in 22.85% cases, and lupus anticoagulant in 35.41%. Acute kidney failure was noted in 25% of patients. The incidence of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 222 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free