Evidence Hub

Vaginal Perforations After Fecal Management System Use in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Series

Sarah V Sebastian, Nicole P. Jenkins, Amber W Chan, S. Sansone, S. Smilen

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a relatively common condition in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Fecal management systems (FMS) were developed to divert stool away from the skin. While they have benefits, rare but serious complications can occur. This case series discusses two cases of vaginal perforations following FMS use in critically ill patients. An 87-year-old female was admitted twice to the ICU for infective endocarditis and bacterial pneumonia. During her second ICU stay, an FMS device was in place for up to 19 days, after which a vaginal perforation with stool leakage from the vagina was noted. In the second case, a 34-year-old female was admitted following disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) from a likely amniotic fluid embolism. An FMS was in situ for four days before a vaginal perforation, with stool leakage from the vagina, occurred. In both cases, neither patient was stable for an exam under anesthesia with possible repair, and therefore conservative management was pursued. Vaginal perforations can occur with FMS, and healthcare workers should be aware of this possible complication. Critically ill patients are at greater risk due to comorbid conditions that may impair tissue integrity, lead to possible fistula formation, and impede successful repair. While currently not listed in manufacturer guidelines, coagulopathies, including DIC, may be considered a relative contraindication for FMS use. Like other medical devices, FMS should be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free