Evidence Hub

Primary Lung Tumors in Children: Insights from a Single-Center Case Series

P. Borgia, B. Cafferata, Claudio Paratore, L. Anfigeno, Alessio Conte, Angelo Florio, A. Gallizia, M. del Monte et al.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Background: Primary lung tumors in pediatric patients are rare, predominantly malignant, and present diagnostic challenges due to symptom overlap with more common conditions such as inflammatory processes or asthma. Evidence-based approaches for managing these rare neoplasms in childhood are scarce. This retrospective study reports the experience of a pediatric referral center in diagnosing and treating these tumors. Methods: Pediatric primary lung tumors treated at Giannina Gaslini Children’s Hospital between January 2016 and January 2024 were included. Data on clinical presentation, histopathology, imaging, treatment approaches, and outcomes were systematically collected and analyzed. Results: Nine patients (six males and three females) were identified, with a mean age (±SD) at diagnosis of 8.81 ± 5 years. The most common clinical manifestation was recurrent pneumonia (four patients), followed by persistent cough and wheezing (three patients). The average duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 12.8 months ± 12.2 months. Histopathological diagnoses were typical carcinoid tumors (n = 2), atypical carcinoid tumors (n = 2), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (n = 2), congenital peribronchial myofibroblastic tumor (n = 1), myoepithelial carcinoma (n = 1), and pleuropulmonary blastoma (n = 1). Radical surgery resulted in complete response for seven patients, with a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR 39 months). The myoepithelial carcinoma was treated with multimodal therapy,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free