Evidence Hub

A case of infectious endocarditis and vertebral discitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 23A.

Kawamura M, Ono D, Kawamura T, Mimura K, Ebata E, Chang B, Akeda Y, Yoshitake A et al.

Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2025

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae, is a Gram-positive diplococcus, causes various community-acquired infections. Although pneumococcal vaccination has reduced the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease, relative incidence of non-vaccine serotype-associated infections has increased. Herein, we report a case of pneumococcal infectious endocarditis and vertebral discitis diagnosed concurrently. A 73-year-old man presented with a 1-week history of fever and back pain (day 0). Laboratory tests revealed elevated inflammatory markers and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed vertebral osteomyelitis. Empirical intravenous cefazolin and vancomycin were initiated, considering appropriate coverage for common causative organisms of vertebral osteomyelitis. On day 1, blood cultures yielded S. pneumoniae- later identified as penicillin G susceptible serotype 23A belonging to sequence type 5242 -and antibiotics were switched to ceftriaxone and vancomycin. On the same day, the patient developed worsening oxygenation and a systolic murmur. Echocardiography revealed a mitral valve vegetation with severe regurgitation. Cefepime and vancomycin were initiated on day 2, followed by meropenem and vancomycin on day 4 for potential nosocomial pneumonia. On day 6, cefepime monotherapy was continued after methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was not detected in sputum culture. To address persistent respiratory failure, mitral valve replacement was performed on day 7. Cultures of tissue removed from…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free