Evidence Hub

Case Report: Necrotizing pneumonia in pediatric patients: a rare case of unilateral necrosis in two entire lobe tissues

Jingli Zhang, Ying-Qian Zhang, Longfei Gao, Huifang Wu, Xiao-Juan Liu, Fan Yang, Yingxue Wang

Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Background Necrotizing pneumonia is a serious complication of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection, especially in pediatric patients. Although necrotizing pneumonia is a rare condition, the occurrence of unilateral necrosis in two entire lobe tissues is even rarer. This case study presents a 5-year-old male child with necrotizing pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae, describing the clinical features, laboratory abnormalities, and radiographic findings associated with this condition, particularly the rare occurrence of unilateral necrosis in two entire lobe tissues. Case presentation The patient presented with a 14-day history of fever and cough, accompanied by paroxysmal cough with continuous sounds, congested throat, increased respiratory effort, and abnormal lung findings on physical examination. Laboratory investigations revealed elevated white blood cell count, increased inflammatory markers, elevated liver enzymes, coagulation dysfunction, and hypoalbuminemia. Imaging studies showed the presence of pleural effusion and progressive necrotizing pneumonia, including the rare occurrence of unilateral necrosis affecting both entire lobe tissues. Conclusion Necrotizing pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection can present with prolonged fever, elevated inflammatory markers, pleural effusion, and progressive necrosis of lung tissue, with the occurrence of necrosis observed unilaterally in both entire lobe tissues is even rarer. Monitoring D-dimer levels is essential…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free