Evidence Hub

Severe pneumonia caused by Nocardia otitidiscaviarum in a patient with bronchiectasis and IgA nephropathy: a case report

Yi Lin, Zhao-Zhao Jiang, Xiao-Qian Chi, Jian-Sheng Chen, C. Wen, Chao Zhang, Ying-Ying Wang, Guang-Liang Xie

Frontiers in Medicine, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Background Nocardia species are rare opportunistic pathogens in the clinic, with strong invasiveness and dissemination, that can cause serious pulmonary infection, especially in immunocompromised patients, chronic lung diseases and hormone use, and is easy to be missed and misdiagnosed, preventing patients from obtaining timely and effective treatment, resulting in a high mortality rate. Case presentation Here, we present a rare case of a patient with chronic bronchiectasis and IgA nephropathy who developed Nocardia otitidiscaviarum pneumonia shortly after hormone therapy. The patient presented with tongue and lip ulcers, chest distress, cough, expectoration, and fever as the initial symptoms, which were extremely similar to common bacterial pulmonary infections. The laboratory examination and pulmonary computer tomography results indicated pulmonary infection, but the blood and multiple sputum cultures failed to identify the pathogen. Empirical treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam sodium and ceftriaxone was ineffective, and the patient’s condition worsened and progressed to respiratory failure. Subsequently, a bronchoscopy examination was performed, and the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was collected for bacterial culture, which indicated Nocardia infection, however the treatment used of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combined with imipenem was not effective. Finally, the patient was confirmed to have Nocardia otitidiscaviarum infection by mass spectrometry. According to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free