Evidence Hub

Severe Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia That Was Difficult to Diagnose due to Complications of Postoperative Candida Sepsis in an Elderly Patient with Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report

K. Toritani, Hideaki Kimura, Manabu Maebashi, Kota Imanishi, M. Homma, Kazuki Kurimura, Serina Haruyama, Y. Nakamori et al.

Case Reports in Gastroenterology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Pneumonia is a leading cause of postoperative mortality in elderly patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and close attention should be paid to the possibility of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) in patients with immunosuppression. We present the case of a patient with severe PJP that was challenging to diagnose because of postoperative Candida sepsis complications in an elderly patient with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) with immunosuppression. Case Presentation: A 70-year-old man was transferred to our hospital and was diagnosed with ASUC. The patient underwent laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for prednisolone and granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis-resistance UC 22 days after transfer. On postoperative day (POD) 9, the central venous catheter (CVC) was removed because CVC-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) was suspected. On POD 12, fluconazole was administered for Candida parapsilosis sepsis due to CRBSI, and a septic pulmonary embolism was suspected. The patient’s hypoxemia worsened; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was administered because PJP was suspected on POD 19; however, ventilatory support was started on POD 21. PJP was diagnosed based on bronchoalveolar lavage on POD 25, and high-dose prednisolone therapy was initiated. The patient was weaned off the ventilator on POD 27 and was discharged home on POD 54. Proctectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were performed at 10 months postoperatively, and the patient…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free