Evidence Hub

Re-challenging pralsetinib following recovery from pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in a lung cancer patient: a Case Report

Zhen-Jun Zhao, Long-bin Pang, Surui Liu, Jie Liu

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), an opportunistic infection, is commonly observed in immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with cancer, and is known for its significant morbidity and mortality rates. Pralsetinib is a highly specific inhibitor that targets advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) characterized by RET-fusion positivity. The incidence of PJP infection in patients receiving pralsetinib was found to be infrequent. However, there is currently a lack of consensus regarding the rechallenge of pralsetinib in patients who have fully recovered from PJP. Case presentation In this case study, a 60-year-old patient diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and carrying a KIF5B-RET fusion gene underwent pralsetinib treatment as the fourth-line therapy. Subsequently, the patient developed a fever and dyspnea 2.5 months later. However, the patient did not exhibit a positive response to the empirical antibiotic therapy administered. The computed tomography findings indicated widespread ground-glass opacities with numerous cystic lesions in both lungs, along with patchy consolidations in the lower right lung. The diagnosis of PJP was conclusively confirmed through bronchoalveolar lavage. The patient’s condition was effectively treated with a combination of oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and intravenous caspofungin along with clindamycin. The patient fully recovered from PJP. Subsequently, he underwent a rechallenge with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free