Evidence Hub

Decision for early tracheostomy in respiratory failure of a paralyzed myasthenia gravis patient with sepsis-induced pneumonia: A case report

Resiana Karnina, Adhrie Sugiarto, R. Sedono, D. Aditianingsih, S. Manggala, D. Purwaamidjaja

International journal of surgery case reports, 2024

Abstract

Introduction The neuromuscular condition myasthenia gravis (MG) can make treating sepsis-induced pneumonia more challenging. Since these patients risk respiratory failure, decisions about airway treatment, including tracheostomy, can be difficult. We report a case of a patient with sepsis and concurrent MG who underwent an early tracheostomy due to acute respiratory failure. Presentation of case A 44-year-old woman with a history of MG presented to the emergency department with a stiff tongue, hypersalivation, limb paralysis and a phlegmy cough causing severe respiratory distress, aggravated by community-acquired pneumonia. A chest X-ray showed extensive infiltration and consolidation in the lower lobes. The patient was transferred immediately to the intensive care unit on mechanical ventilation. Despite initial treatment with antibiotics and respiratory support, her mental and respiratory status deteriorated rapidly. Given the risk of myasthenic crisis, sepsis and impending respiratory failure, with anticipated lengthy ventilator utilization and hospitalization, a multidisciplinary team decided to perform an early tracheostomy. Discussion The early tracheostomy procedure was carried out securely on the third day of hospitalization. This allowed for better pulmonary hygiene, adequate ventilation, airway clearance and rehabilitation therapy. The family contributed to stoma care and breathing exercises. The patient's respiratory condition steadily improved over the following…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free