Evidence Hub

Management of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-induced refractory dermatomyositis complicated by interstitial pneumonia using tofacitinib and its outcomes: a case report

Y. Imai, Takafumi Yorozuya, Taku Hatakeyama, Takumi Nishimaki, Tomoyuki Takahashi, Tatsuru Ishikawa, Shun Kondoh, Yuichiro Asai et al.

Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis is characterized by cutaneous symptoms but lacks muscle symptoms. Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies are frequently found in Japanese patients with clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis. Patients with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with positive anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies have poor prognoses, and majority of them are treated with combination immunosuppressive therapy; however, the best treatment is yet to be determined. A 52-year-old Asian male patient presented with a chief complaint of dyspnea on exertion. He had a typical skin rash and rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia. Additionally, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies were detected; therefore, he was diagnosed with dermatomyositis-associated interstitial pneumonia. Respiratory failure worsened despite administering steroid pulse therapy, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide. Consequently, plasma exchange was performed on day 13 of admission. After a slight improvement, the patient’s respiratory failure worsened. Thus, cyclophosphamide was replaced by tofacitinib on day 28. Although respiratory failure improved and the progression of interstitial pneumonia seemed under control, βD-glucan level increased and Aspergillus antigen was detected on day 49. Micafungin and voriconazole were administered, but the patient succumbed to worsening respiratory failure on day 61. The pathological autopsy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free