Evidence Hub

Cost-Effectiveness of Antibiotics for Geriatric Pneumonia in an Indonesian Regional Hospital

Cyntia Wulandari, Oktaviana Zunnita, Lusi Agus Setiani, Reza Apriandi

Journal Syifa Sciences and Clinical Research, 2025

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness of commonly used antibiotic regimens in geriatric inpatients with pneumonia was evaluated through a retrospective review of medical records at Pelabuhan Ratu Regional General Hospital (January–December 2021). Eligible patients were aged ≥60 years with a length of stay ≥2 days; 100 of 700 records met inclusion. Direct medical costs—antibiotics, inpatient care, and other medications—were obtained from hospital tariffs and expressed in Indonesian Rupiah (Rp). Clinical effectiveness at discharge was defined as temperature ≤37,8 °C, respiratory rate 30/min, and leukocyte count ≤10.500/µL. The most frequently used single agents were ceftriaxone (32%), levofloxacin (26%), azithromycin (14%), and cefixime (2%); common substitutions included ceftriaxone–azithromycin (9%) and levofloxacin–ceftriaxone (6%). The lowest average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) occurred with cefixime (Rp 581.209). In incremental analysis, levofloxacin–cefixime compared with ceftriaxone monotherapy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Rp 117.786 per 1% additional effectiveness, supporting ceftriaxone as the more cost-effective option. Overall, cefixime was most economical by ACER, whereas ceftriaxone monotherapy was preferred by ICER.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free