Evidence Hub

Dosing and Delivery of Bacteriophage Therapy In a Murine Wound Infection Model

Yung‐Hao Lin, Tejas Dharmaraj, Qingquan Chen, Arne Echterhof, Robert Manasherob, Lucy J. Zhang, Zhiwei Li, Cas de Leeuw et al.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 2024

14 citations

Abstract

Abstract Lytic bacteriophages, viruses that lyse (kill) bacteria, hold great promise for treating infections, including wound infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, dosing and delivery strategies for phage therapy remain underdeveloped. In a mouse wound infection model, we investigated the impact of administration route, dose, and frequency on the efficacy of phage therapy. We find that topical but not systemic delivery is effective in this model. In vitro and in vivo data supported the use of high doses of phage. Repeated dosing achieves the highest eradication rates in vivo. Building on these insights, we developed “HydroPhage”, a hyaluronan-based hydrogel system that uses dynamic covalent crosslinking to deliver high-titre phages over one week, a substantial improvement over existing burst-release systems. We conclude that hydrogel-based sustained phage delivery offers a practical, efficacious, and well-tolerated option for topical phage application.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free