Evidence Hub

Time-Varying Proteinuria and Progression of IgA Nephropathy: A Cohort Study

Chen Tang, Pei Chen, Feng-Lei Si, Ji-Cheng Lv, S. Shi, Xu-Jie Zhou, Li-Jun Liu, Hong Zhang

American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2024

1,530 participants · 63 citations

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Proteinuria is a surrogate endpoint for predicting long-term kidney outcomes in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with levels <1 g/d identified as a therapeutic target. However, this threshold has not been sufficiently studied. We aimed to quantify the associations of progression of IgAN with various levels of proteinuria.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

& Participants: 1530 patients with IgAN and at least 12 months of follow-up at Peking University First Hospital.

EXPOSURE

Proteinuria levels updated over time (TV-P).

OUTCOMES

A composite kidney outcome of a 50% reduction in the eGFR or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Marginal structural models (MSMs).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 43.5 [27.2, 72.8] months, 254 (16.6%) patients developed the composite kidney outcome. A graded association was observed between TV-P and composite kidney outcomes with higher risk among those with proteinuria ≥0.5 g/d. Compared with TV-P <0.3 g/d, the HRs (95% CI) for proteinuria levels of 0.3 - <0.5 g/d, 0.5 - <1.0 g/d, 1.0 - <2.0 g/d and ≥ 2.0 g/d were 2.22 (0.88-5.58), 4.04 (1.93-8.46), 8.46 (3.80-18.83) and 38.00 (17.62-81.95), respectively. The trend was more pronounced in patients with baseline proteinuria ≥1.0 g/d among whom a higher risk was observed with TV-P of 0.3 to <0.5 g/d compared to TV-P < 0.3 g/d (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.07-9.92; P=0.04). However, in patients with baseline proteinuria levels <1 g/d, the risk of composite kidney…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,530 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free