Evidence Hub

Spatial Disparities in Short-term Rental Guest-Perceived Accommodation Quality: A Twelve-City Comparative Analysis Using Airbnb Review Data and Explainable Machine Learning

Gao J, Lin D, Hu J

2026

Abstract

Abstract Housing satisfaction has traditionally been measured through small-sample surveys with significant temporal lags, limiting its utility for spatial policy diagnostics. This study treats Airbnb guest reviews as a direct, systematically measurable expression of short-term rental guest-perceived accommodation quality (STR-GPAQ)—a bounded but meaningful signal of urban short-term rental service quality variation—examining spatial disparities across twelve cities spanning four continents with divergent short-term rental (STR) regulatory regimes. We develop an integrated explainable machine learning pipeline combining XGBoost binary classification, SHAP interpretability analysis, and the STR-GPAQ Inequality Index (SII)—a Gini-inspired metric specifically designed to measure inequality in the short-term rental guest-perceived quality domain, justified by axioms of distributional inequality measurement. While we retain the name SII for brevity, the index measures STR-GPAQ inequality, not general housing satisfaction. Our pipeline achieves a cross-validated accuracy of 0.867, AUC of 0.789 (spatial block CV AUC = 0.749 ± 0.020), and F1-score of 0.928 across 297,227 listings. The model exhibits near-zero negative-class recall (0.042), reflecting the inherent class imbalance in Airbnb review scores; SII therefore measures quality dispersion in the upper-mid to high range, not absolute deprivation. Amsterdam exhibits the lowest distributional inequality (SII = 0.031) alongside…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a theoretical / analytical, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free