Evidence Hub

Causal Inference in Non-Allergic Asthma Associated with Obesity: Application of the Bradford Hill Viewpoints to a Complex Epidemiological Association

Martínez JJL, Carrasco EE, Muñoz FS, Del-Río-Navarro BE, Reyes-Noriega N, Huang F

2026

Abstract

The association between obesity and a distinct, non-allergic, late-onset, neutrophilic asthma phenotype has been recognised for over two decades. However, establishing obesity as a causal factor rather than a comorbidity remains methodologically chal-lenging. Randomised allocation to obesity is neither feasible nor ethical. The relationship is mediated by a complex network of mechanical, immunometabolic, microbial, hor-monal, and epigenetic mechanisms. This review applies Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s nine viewpoints (1965) as a structured framework for causal inference to the 2020–2026 evi-dence linking obesity to non-T2 asthma. Evidence for strength (effect sizes 1.4–6.8; E-values 4.8–13.4; Mendelian-randomisation summary risk ratio 1.05 per 1 kg/m²), con-sistency (replication across continents, age groups, sexes, and study designs), temporality (cohort and life-course Mendelian-randomisation evidence), biological gradient (BMI dose–response with TNFα, IL-17A, and Th17 frequency), plausibility (a twelve-layer architecture from adipose dysfunction to bronchial epithelium), coherence with the natural history of the phenotype, experimental support (bariatric surgery, lifestyle weight loss, GLP-1 receptor agonist pharmaco-epidemiology, murine and in vitro stud-ies), and analogy with other obesity-related Th17 diseases collectively support a causal interpretation. Specificity, the weakest of Hill’s viewpoints, is satisfied at the phenotype level. Hill’s viewpoints are situated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free