Evidence Hub

Comparison of Perineal Ultrasound in Men Before and After Radical Prostatectomy and in Incontinent Men After Radical Prostatectomy Before and After Operative Treatment With Male Sling

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2020

60 participants

Abstract

Prospective study to evaluate a new technique. Comparison of perineal sonography in men before and after radical prostatectomy and in incontinent men after radical prostatectomy before and after operative treatment with male sling and comparison with pre- and postoperative functional MRI

Inclusion / Exclusion criteria: Inclusion: male, elder than 18years, planned RALP or history of RALP and PPSUI (Post Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence).

Exclusion: Patients with history of urinary incontinence before radical prostatectomy. Patients with history of radiotherapy in the pelvis. Other diseases involving pelvic floor.

Conditions: Urinary Incontinence, Stress.

Primary outcome: perineal sonography; IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score); 24h pad test; perineal sonography; IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score); 24h pad test; perineal sonography; IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score); 24h pad test; ICIQ SF (International Questionnaire on Urinary Incontinence - Short Form); ICIQ SF (International Questionnaire on Urinary Incontinence - Short Form); ICIQ SF (International Questionnaire on Urinary Incontinence - Short Form); IIEF 5 (International Index of Erectile Function); IIEF 5 (International Index of Erectile Function); IIEF 5 (International Index of Erectile Function); VAS QoL (Visual Analogue Scale - Quality of Life); VAS QoL (Visual Analogue Scale - Quality of Life); VAS QoL (Visual Analogue Scale - Quality of Life); PGI (Patient Generated Index); PGI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free