Evidence Hub

Lower respiratory tract microbiota characteristics in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia during antibiotic therapy

Jiang Y, Wang R, Qin X, Shen L, Xing H, Ye F, Yin L, Yang Y et al.

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026

12 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) is a major cause of bacterial pneumonia in older adults, yet the composition of the lower respiratory tract (LRT) microbiota in patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia (PAP), and its potential prognostic relevance, remain poorly defined.

METHODS: Here, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid collected from older adults with PAP at hospital admission and discharge, yielding 42 paired samples. We characterized longitudinal microbiota dynamics, identified candidate microbial biomarkers using LEfSe and random forest analyses, inferred functional profiles with Tax4Fun2, and compared microbiota-associated changes following meropenem-based therapy (n = 12) or levofloxacin-based therapy (n = 9).

RESULTS: PAP was associated with marked shifts in LRT microbial community structure, with post-treatment samples showing reduced Pseudomonas abundance and increased relative abundances of Rothia, Streptococcus and Porphyromonas (p < 0.05). Random forest modeling identified P. aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Prevotella melaninogenica as potential diagnostic biomarkers (AUC = 0.93). Functional prediction further suggested a reduction in biofilm-formation-related pathways after treatment (p < 0.01). Notably, Pseudomonas abundance correlated positively with white blood cell count and C-reactive protein, but inversely with lymphocyte and platelet counts, supporting the potential value of these clinical indices in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free