Diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Using Machine Learning
Abstract
We train a machine learning model on a dataset of 2177 individuals using as features 26 probe sets and their age in order to classify if someone has acute myeloid leukaemia or is healthy. The dataset is multicentric and consists of data from 27 organisations, 25 cities, 15 countries and 4 continents. The accuracy or our model is 99.94\% and its F1-score 0.9996. To the best of our knowledge the performance of our model is the best one in the literature, as regards the prediction of AML using similar or not data. Moreover, there has not been any bibliographic reference associated with acute myeloid leukaemia for the 26 probe sets we used as features in our model.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 2,177 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Understanding the factors influencing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J.E. Smith) damage in African smallholder maize fields and quantifying its impact on yield. A case study in Eastern Zimbabwe
- Alarming situation of emerging H5 and H7 avian influenza and effective control strategies
- Livestock and food security: vulnerability to population growth and climate change
- Atmosphere–ocean oxygen and productivity dynamics during early animal radiations
- Characterization of the global distribution and diversified plasmid reservoirs of the colistin resistance gene mcr-9
- The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pigs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.