Evidence Hub

Comparative effectiveness of therapies for Graves' hyperthyroidism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Sundaresh V, Brito JP, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Stan MN, Murad MH, Bahn RS

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2013

1,402 participants · 218 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT: Several treatment options are available for Graves' disease (GD), including antithyroid drugs (ATDs), radioactive iodine (RAI), and thyroidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The primary outcome was to determine the relapse rates of various treatment options. The secondary outcome was to present data regarding adverse effects of ATDs.

DATA SOURCES: We searched multiple databases through March 2012.

STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials and comparative cohort studies in adults that included 2 or more treatment options for GD.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently selected studies, appraised study quality, extracted outcome data, and determined adverse effect profiles.

DATA SYNTHESIS: We found 8 studies with 1402 patients from 5 continents. Mean follow-up duration in months was: ATDs, 57; RAI, 64; and surgery, 59. Studies were at moderate to high risk of bias. Network meta-analysis suggested higher relapse rates with ATDs (52.7%; 352 of 667) than RAI (15%, 46 of 304) (odds ratio = 6.25; 95% confidence interval, 2.40-16.67) and with ATDs than surgery (10%; 39 of 387) (odds ratio = 9.09; 95% confidence interval, 4.65-19.23). There was no significant difference in relapse between RAI and surgery. Examination of 31 cohort studies identified adverse effects of ATDs in 692 of 5136 (13%) patients. These were more common with methimazole, mainly owing to dermatological complications, whereas hepatic effects were more common with propylthiouracil use.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,402 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free