Evidence Hub

Assessment of performance of stratum-specific likelihood ratios of the aldosteronoma resolution score for predicting hypertension cure after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Marzano L, Husain-Syed F, Reis T, Ronco C, Zanella M

Journal of human hypertension, 2023

2,158 participants

Abstract

The Aldosteronoma Resolution Score (ARS) is the most studied scoring system for predicting the high likelihood of hypertension cure after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA). However, the ARS's accuracy in PA patients worldwide is uncertain. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the accuracy, discrimination, and calibration of the ARS using stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLR) by organizing available data from cohort studies. We searched PubMed, Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science to November 2021 according to PRISMA statement. The quality assessment used adapted TRIPOD and PROBAST criteria. Thirteen studies comprising 2158 PA patients from North America (43%), Europe (32%), Asia (22%), and other continents, were included. The pooled estimate of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for all studies was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81), and the ratio of the observed to expected complete resolution of hypertension (CRH) for all studies was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.8-1.0). The summary estimates of the SSLR for all studies were 0.31, 0.89, and 3.1, for the low (ARS 0-1), medium (ARS 2-3), and high-likelihood group (ARS 4-5) of CRH, respectively. However, substantial heterogeneity existed among studies. Follow-up period, and adrenalectomy AVS (adrenal vein sampling)-guided served as potential sources of heterogeneity for quantitative studies, which were measurement and reference standard for qualitative studies selection. In…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,158 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free