Evidence Hub

Molecular prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in world soils: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nayeri T, Moosazadeh M, Ghaffarifar F, Dalimi Asl A, Maspi N, Ghasemi E

Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports, 2026

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is a globally distributed protozoan parasite known for its zoonotic potential and health implications for humans and animals. Soil is a significant reservoir for T. gondii oocysts, which can contaminate agricultural products and threaten food safety and public health. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to determine the molecular prevalence of T. gondii in soils worldwide. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in several electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science) and the Google Scholar search engine, targeting studies published up to December 2024. The data were synthesized using a random effect model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The screening process revealed 44 relevant studies, of which 27 met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of T. gondii in soil samples was 14% (95% CI 13 to 16%) using molecular detection methods. Also, meta-regression analysis showed no statistically significant differences in the overall prevalence of T. gondii in soil samples based on continents (P = 0.343), diagnostic methods (P = 0.919), and quality assessment score (P = 0.110). These findings highlight the widespread presence of T. gondii in soil and raise concerns about its implications for agricultural practices and food safety. The results support increased monitoring of soil contamination and the development of strategies to reduce the risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free