Evidence Hub

Global Microbiome: Core and Unique Signatures Across Diverse Populations

Huang S, Chaudhari DS, Shukla R, Kanani P, Zeidan RS, Lin Y, Burrow W, Mankowski RT et al.

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Earlier analyses evaluating patterns of gut microbiota in individuals from different geographies and age groups are heterogeneous in methodology, precluding broader conclusions about the relationship between the gut microbiome and geographic region, age, and clinical health. Here, we systematically conducted a meta-analysis of 16s rRNA gut microbiome sequencing data representing 10,878 samples across North America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Oceania. Our analysis included 27 countries and three age groups (neonate to age 17, or AG01; ages 18 to 64, or AG02; 65 and above, or AG03). We identified that Firmicutes, Bacteriodetes, and Proteobacteria constitute core phyla across geographic regions. A differing predominance of top families alongside core family Lachnospiracaeae across regions comprised unique microbiome signatures. Countries also differed in their relative abundances of Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, Lactobacillus and Bacteroides. We found in our age analyses that Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were the most abundant phyla in AG01, and Actinobacteria abundance declined across all continents with increasing age. The relative abundance of Bacteriodetes increased between AG01 and AG02. Enrichment of asthma-associated Enterobacterieaceae in AG01 was highest for North America, followed by Europe and then in Asia. We discuss the correlation of these gut microbial patterns in the context of dietary patterns, populations health, clinical health trends, and healthy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free