Evidence Hub

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease frequency around the globe: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cholaky-Mejía NR, Abde-Celis MI, Pachón-Suárez DI, Vega-Tapia F, Olate-Perez A, Couto C, Schlaen A, Arellanes-Garcia L et al.

Eye (London, England), 2026

Abstract

Background/objectives: Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease has been historically associated with specific ethnic groups, suggesting an underlying susceptibility. Prior to this study, no meta-analysis had synthesized the global epidemiology of VKH, and therefore, information on its geographic distribution remained incomplete. The present study aims to determine the global distribution of VKH disease diagnosis in individuals presenting with uveitis.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies published between 2001 and 2025 in PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS was conducted following PRISMA-P guidelines. Case reports were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Murad assessment tool for case series. A random-effects model was used to pool frequency estimates with 95% confidence intervals and prediction intervals.

Results: Of 7153 articles identified, 258 studies were analyzed, spanning six continents and 44 countries. The estimated frequency of VKH among uveitis cases was 5.11% (CI:4.31-5.90%; PI: 0.00-15.18%) overall, with predominance of females. When subgrouped into pediatric and adult populations, the estimated frequency was 2.43% (CI:1.83-3.02%; PI: 0.00-6.38%) and 6.15% (CI:4.06-8.24%; PI: 0.00-19.77%), respectively. Frequencies varied across regions, with higher rates reported in Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Africa, and lower rates in North America, Europe, and Oceania. Regarding the quality evaluation, most studies were considered as…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free