Evidence Hub

HPV in breast cancer: prevalence and comparison with healthy tissue-a systematic review and meta-analysis

de Souza Wagner PH, Matheus GTFU, Menegat BLRS, Menegat ALRS, Ribeiro DM, de Moraes FCA

Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with over 2.3 million new cases annually. Recent studies suggest that Human Papillomavirus (HPV), a known oncogenic virus, may be involved in BC development. This study investigates HPV prevalence in BC samples and its potential role in tumorigenesis.

Methods: Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate raw proportions and odds ratio (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Analyses were performed in R 4.5.0 RESULTS: Our meta-analysis encompassed 82 studies and evaluated 7,683 breast cancer (BC) tissue samples to assess the presence of HPV. The overall prevalence of HPV in BC specimens was estimated at 23% (95%CI: 19%-28%). When stratified by continent, Oceania exhibited the highest regional prevalence at 38%. Comparative analysis between BC tissues and healthy controls revealed a significantly increased likelihood of HPV detection in the cancer group (OR 5.06; P < 0.001). This association remained statistically robust in both case-control (OR 6.34; P < 0.001) and cross-sectional designs (OR 2.83; P < 0.001). Among continents, South America demonstrated the most pronounced association (OR 11.66; P = 0.005). Subgroup analysis based on economic classification indicated that countries with low-income settings had the highest HPV prevalence (34%; 95%CI: 9%-73%). Evaluation by BC subtype revealed that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free