Evidence Hub

Global prevalence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris in humans between 2015 and 2024: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Achilonu CC, Barwatt WJ, Kottom TJ, Oladele RO, Ramatla T, Limper AH

Medical mycology, 2025

578 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen with high rates of multidrug resistance, posing a significant global health threat. Immunosuppressed patients are particularly vulnerable to multidrug-resistant (MDR) C. auris infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SR-MA) aimed to assess the global prevalence of MDR-C. auris isolates in humans and their resistance to antifungal drugs, primarily fluconazole (FLZ), voriconazole (VOR), and amphotericin B (AmB). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases on published studies regarding clinical C. auris isolates and the use of antifungal susceptibility testing assay from 17 March 2015 to 1 February 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to determine the estimated pooled prevalence of MDR-C. auris isolates and their antifungal resistance profiles from immunosuppressed humans. A total of 81 research studies were included in the final analysis, with the overall pooled prevalence of the three most important antifungal drugs; FLZ (92.5% | 95% CI: 89.5-94.7), VOR (49.0% | 95% CI: 37.6-60.4), and AmB (51.0% | 95% CI: 42.3-59.7). According to the subgroup analyses, FLZ-resistant C. auris was the most prevalent isolate observed in the five continents reporting compared to the VOR- and AmB-resistant C. auris having lower pooled prevalence. Further, higher pooled prevalence of MDR-C. auris isolates were observed from males (68.2%, n = 578) compared to females (37.1%, n…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 578 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free