Evidence Hub

The prevalence of nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease in patients with iron deficiency anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

De Silva R, Thomas JP, Murali N, Senathirajah L, Rajendra R, Bialecki S, Chan SSM, Alexandre L

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2026

9,807 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: Gastrointestinal pathology is a major cause of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). While previous studies have focused on establishing the prevalence of malignant gastrointestinal disease, the prevalence of nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease in patients with IDA has not been analyzed systematically. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of normal findings, individual nonmalignant findings, and malignancy in patients with IDA.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Scopus from inception for observational studies that reported the prevalence of individual upper and lower gastrointestinal pathologies among adults (≥18 years) with confirmed IDA who underwent endoscopic investigation. We also sought to establish the prevalence of normal endoscopic findings within the IDA population as well as the prevalence of nonmalignant and malignant gastrointestinal pathology amongst clinically relevant subgroups. Results were synthesized using a random effects meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 8563 citations were screened, and 39 articles were included from four continents, comprising 9807 patients with IDA. Overall, the most prevalent upper gastrointestinal finding was Helicobacter pylori gastritis (27.0%), and the most prevalent lower gastrointestinal finding was hemorrhoids (10.0%). The overall prevalence of upper gastrointestinal malignancy was 5.0%, and the prevalence of colorectal cancer was 8.0%. A total of 52.0% of upper…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,807 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free